Core i7-860 vs Pentium 4417U
Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 75.4 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-860 is 1.8 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 75.4 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-860 is 1.8 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
806ea
Core
Lynnfield
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2009
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
19.19k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.43k points
41.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-860
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
7.94k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
5.25k
11.35k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
2.39k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
2.8k (x0.9)
TOTAL
19.19k
24.49k (x1.28)
Multithread
i7-860
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.5k
13.1k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
21.1k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.47k
4.49k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
2.46k (x0.49)
TOTAL
75.43k
41.15k (x0.55)
Performance/W
i7-860
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
332 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
247 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
163 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
52 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
794 points/W
2743 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-860
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
2271 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1514 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
902 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
5534 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4