Core i7-860 vs Pentium 4405U
Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 4405U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 75.4 k points while the 4405U gets 51.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-860 is 1.5 times faster than the 4405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 75.4 k points while the 4405U gets 51.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-860 is 1.5 times faster than the 4405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
406e3
Core
Lynnfield
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
2.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
19.19k points
23.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.43k points
51.1k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-860
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
7.45k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
5.25k
10.51k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
2.78k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
2.59k (x0.83)
TOTAL
19.19k
23.33k (x1.22)
Multithread
i7-860
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.5k
16.1k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
25.44k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.47k
6.99k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
2.58k (x0.52)
TOTAL
75.43k
51.1k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i7-860
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
332 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
247 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
163 points/W
466 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
52 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
794 points/W
3407 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-860
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
2271 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1514 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
1324 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
902 points/GHz
1232 points/GHz
TOTAL
5534 points/GHz
11109 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4