Core i7-860 vs i7-950
Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i7-950 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 75.4 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-950 is 1 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 75.4 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-950 is 1 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
106a5
Core
Lynnfield
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
95 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2009
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
19.19k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.43k points
76.29k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-860
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
8.01k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
5.25k
5.38k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
3.11k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
2.96k (x0.95)
TOTAL
19.19k
19.46k (x1.01)
Multithread
i7-860
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
31.5k
31.53k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
24.16k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.47k
15.84k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
4.75k (x0.95)
TOTAL
75.43k
76.29k (x1.01)
Performance/W
i7-860
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
332 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
247 points/W
186 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
163 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
52 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
794 points/W
587 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-860
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
2271 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1514 points/GHz
1614 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
934 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
902 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
5534 points/GHz
5839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4