Core i7-860 vs i5-5200U
Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 49.5 k points while the i5-5200U gets 32.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-860 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 49.5 k points while the i5-5200U gets 32.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-860 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
306d4
Core
Lynnfield
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2009
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
19.19k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.43k points
68.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-860
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.15k
2.67k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
4.87k
9.37k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.82k
3.13k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
2.59k (x0.83)
TOTAL
12.97k
17.76k (x1.37)
Multithread
i7-860
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
4.16k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
19.01k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.65k
6.48k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.02k
2.96k (x0.59)
TOTAL
49.54k
32.61k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i7-860
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
87 points/W
277 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
228 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
154 points/W
432 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
521 points/W
2174 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-860
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
620 points/GHz
988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1405 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
814 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
902 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
TOTAL
3741 points/GHz
6577 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4