Core i7-860 vs i5-2400
Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 49.5 k points while the i5-2400 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 49.5 k points while the i5-2400 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
206a7
Core
Lynnfield
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2009
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
19.19k points
25.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
75.43k points
84.36k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-860
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.15k
2.72k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
4.87k
7.6k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.82k
3.98k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
4.47k (x1.43)
TOTAL
12.97k
18.78k (x1.45)
Multithread
i7-860
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
10.37k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
28.84k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.65k
15.08k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.02k
4.67k (x0.93)
TOTAL
49.54k
58.95k (x1.19)
Performance/W
i7-860
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
87 points/W
109 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
228 points/W
304 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
154 points/W
159 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
521 points/W
620 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-860
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
620 points/GHz
801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1405 points/GHz
2236 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
814 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
902 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
TOTAL
3741 points/GHz
5523 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4