| | | | | | |

Core i7-9850H vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
50654
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9850H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4.11k
3k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
12.29k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
3.64k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.98k
6.55k (x0.55)
TOTAL
36.32k
25.46k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-9850H

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
22.68k
20.42k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
83.77k
95.83k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.37k
30.88k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.55k
9.7k (x1.13)
TOTAL
145.37k
156.83k (x1.08)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
18.78k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
16.25k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.99k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
6.8k (x0.75)
TOTAL
49.24k
45.82k (x0.93)

Multithread

i7-9850H

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
133.55k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
108.43k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
30.02k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
9.48k (x0.99)
TOTAL
289.3k
281.48k (x0.97)

Performance/W
i7-9850H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4