| | | | | | |

Core i7-9850H vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
406f1
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9850H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.11k
2.6k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
7.55k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
2.61k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.98k
2.03k (x0.17)
TOTAL
36.32k
14.79k (x0.41)

Multithread

i7-9850H

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.68k
17.41k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
83.77k
75.46k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.37k
26.25k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.55k
4.65k (x0.54)
TOTAL
145.37k
123.78k (x0.85)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9850H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.5k
8.22k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
20.73k
12.06k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
4.01k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.09k
2.89k (x0.26)
TOTAL
51.62k
27.18k (x0.53)

Multithread

i7-9850H

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
77.18k
61.34k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
126.35k
90.21k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.63k
26.2k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.87k
4.62k (x0.59)
TOTAL
245.03k
182.37k (x0.74)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
12.16k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
11.82k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.02k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
2.4k (x0.27)
TOTAL
49.24k
29.39k (x0.6)

Multithread

i7-9850H

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
103.77k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
102.28k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
26.13k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
5.65k (x0.59)
TOTAL
289.3k
237.83k (x0.82)

Performance/W
i7-9850H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4