| | | | | | |

Core i7-9850H vs i7-10750H


Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9850H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9850H
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.11k
4.69k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
18.71k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.84k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.98k
13.95k (x1.16)
TOTAL
36.32k
43.19k (x1.19)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.68k
18.79k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
83.77k
86.1k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.37k
27.42k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.55k
5.27k (x0.62)
TOTAL
145.37k
137.58k (x0.95)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9850H
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.5k
16.63k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
20.73k
24.17k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
6.38k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.09k
13.69k (x1.23)
TOTAL
51.62k
60.87k (x1.18)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
77.18k
67.07k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
126.35k
107.95k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.63k
27.05k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.87k
5.07k (x0.64)
TOTAL
245.03k
207.14k (x0.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
29.06k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
26.49k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
6.23k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
13.89k (x1.54)
TOTAL
49.24k
75.67k (x1.54)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
154.61k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
151.34k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
36.33k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
6.93k (x0.72)
TOTAL
289.3k
349.21k (x1.21)

Performance/W
i7-9850H
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4