| | | | | | |

Core i7-9850H vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9850H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9850H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.11k
4.3k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
16.56k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.25k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.98k
12.61k (x1.05)
TOTAL
36.32k
38.72k (x1.07)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.68k
18.1k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
83.77k
79.16k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.37k
26.75k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.55k
13.81k (x1.61)
TOTAL
145.37k
137.82k (x0.95)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
26.28k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
23.38k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
5.52k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
12.96k (x1.44)
TOTAL
49.24k
68.14k (x1.38)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
163.67k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
159.74k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
39k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
7.56k (x0.79)
TOTAL
289.3k
369.97k (x1.28)

Performance/W
i7-9850H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4