| | | | | | |

Core i7-9850H vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9850H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.11k
4.05k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
15.29k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
9.04k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.98k
10.54k (x0.88)
TOTAL
36.32k
38.92k (x1.07)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.68k
9.05k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
83.77k
33.88k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.37k
15.34k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.55k
6.74k (x0.79)
TOTAL
145.37k
65.01k (x0.45)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9850H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.5k
7.07k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
20.73k
10.55k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
5.27k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.09k
5.66k (x0.51)
TOTAL
51.62k
28.56k (x0.55)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
77.18k
25.28k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
126.35k
37.48k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.63k
17.77k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.87k
6.92k (x0.88)
TOTAL
245.03k
87.45k (x0.36)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
25.53k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
19.99k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
9.31k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
10.81k (x1.2)
TOTAL
49.24k
65.64k (x1.33)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
58.46k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
57.31k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
20.1k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
6.81k (x0.71)
TOTAL
289.3k
142.69k (x0.49)

Performance/W
i7-9850H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4