| | | | | | |

Core i7-9850H vs Ryzen 7 4800H


Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.5 times faster than the i7-9850H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
June 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
436.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
16.59k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
23.51k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
9.38k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
7.98k (x0.88)
TOTAL
49.24k
57.47k (x1.17)

Multithread

i7-9850H

4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
152.43k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
195.79k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
83.2k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
5.38k (x0.56)
TOTAL
289.3k
436.8k (x1.51)

Performance/W
i7-9850H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
9707 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4