Core i7-9850H vs Athlon X4 950
Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2.9 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2.9 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
660f51
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
12.44k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
15.96k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.54k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
3k (x0.33)
TOTAL
49.24k
34.93k (x0.71)
Multithread
i7-9850H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
40.75k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
42.07k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
12.53k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
4.45k (x0.46)
TOTAL
289.3k
99.8k (x0.34)
Performance/W
i7-9850H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4