| | | | | | |

Core i7-9850H vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9850H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.11k
3.75k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
17.22k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
9.79k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.98k
8.21k (x0.69)
TOTAL
36.32k
38.97k (x1.07)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.68k
9.19k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
83.77k
35.47k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.37k
19.14k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.55k
5.82k (x0.68)
TOTAL
145.37k
69.62k (x0.48)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9850H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.5k
12.9k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
20.73k
21.4k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
10.73k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.09k
8.16k (x0.74)
TOTAL
51.62k
53.19k (x1.03)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
77.18k
30.31k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
126.35k
45.13k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.63k
20.17k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.87k
5.77k (x0.73)
TOTAL
245.03k
101.38k (x0.41)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
24.25k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
21.63k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
9.09k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
7.23k (x0.8)
TOTAL
49.24k
62.19k (x1.26)

Multithread

i7-9850H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
56.9k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
55.68k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
19.29k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
6.09k (x0.63)
TOTAL
289.3k
137.96k (x0.48)

Performance/W
i7-9850H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4