| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Xeon X5675


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 254.5 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 2 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
206c2
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/12
6 /12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
124.92k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
8.77k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
5.82k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
3.47k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
2.98k (x0.23)
TOTAL
59.03k
21.04k (x0.36)

Multithread

i7-9750H

X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
53.23k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
39.35k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
27.05k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
5.28k (x0.45)
TOTAL
254.54k
124.92k (x0.49)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1932 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2803 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
658 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5656 points/W
1315 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3627 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5205 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1343 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2942 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
13118 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4