Core i7-9750H vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
406f1
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
2.6k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
7.55k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
2.61k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
2.03k (x0.16)
TOTAL
41.54k
14.79k (x0.36)
Multithread
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
17.41k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
75.46k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
26.25k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
4.65k (x0.39)
TOTAL
163.95k
123.78k (x0.75)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
8.22k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
12.06k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
4.01k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
2.89k (x0.22)
TOTAL
59.03k
27.18k (x0.46)
Multithread
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
61.34k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
90.21k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
26.2k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
4.62k (x0.39)
TOTAL
254.54k
182.37k (x0.72)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
6.04k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
10.18k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
2.74k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
2.41k (x0.18)
TOTAL
59.67k
21.37k (x0.36)
Multithread
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
47.51k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
75.12k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
19.72k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
5.45k (x0.46)
TOTAL
258.87k
147.8k (x0.57)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
12.16k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
11.82k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
3.02k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
2.4k (x0.22)
TOTAL
62.92k
29.39k (x0.47)
Multithread
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
103.77k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
102.28k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
26.13k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
5.65k (x0.6)
TOTAL
276.46k
237.83k (x0.86)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4