| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs i5-10500T


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.1 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
302.13k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
3.87k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
15.79k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
5.1k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
12.13k (x0.93)
TOTAL
41.54k
36.89k (x0.89)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
22.17k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
101.79k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
34.13k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
3.74k (x0.31)
TOTAL
163.95k
161.83k (x0.99)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
13.94k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
20.01k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
5.34k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
11.41k (x0.86)
TOTAL
59.03k
50.7k (x0.86)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
82.18k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
124.23k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
35.6k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
3.73k (x0.31)
TOTAL
254.54k
245.75k (x0.97)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
14.01k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
21.17k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.21k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
11.42k (x0.88)
TOTAL
59.67k
51.82k (x0.87)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
82.38k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
115.64k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
32.22k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
3.71k (x0.31)
TOTAL
258.87k
233.94k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
25.16k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
22.28k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.18k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
11.97k (x1.12)
TOTAL
62.92k
64.6k (x1.03)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
144.86k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
120.98k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
32.55k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
3.73k (x0.4)
TOTAL
276.46k
302.13k (x1.09)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4