| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs i3-10110U


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 2.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
806ec
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
106.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
4.26k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
15.48k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
4.94k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
4.31k (x0.33)
TOTAL
41.54k
28.98k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
7.41k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
29.18k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
10.26k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
3.27k (x0.27)
TOTAL
163.95k
50.13k (x0.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
14.3k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
20.09k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
5.23k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
4.24k (x0.32)
TOTAL
59.03k
43.87k (x0.74)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
25.51k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
41.33k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
10.81k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
3.21k (x0.27)
TOTAL
254.54k
80.85k (x0.32)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
14.25k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
21.55k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.16k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
4.26k (x0.33)
TOTAL
59.67k
45.22k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
26.15k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
44.03k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
10.71k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
3.28k (x0.28)
TOTAL
258.87k
84.17k (x0.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
24.6k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
22.32k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.02k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
4.7k (x0.44)
TOTAL
62.92k
56.64k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
47.98k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
44.28k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
10.33k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
3.98k (x0.42)
TOTAL
276.46k
106.58k (x0.39)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4