Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
14.87k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
21.53k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
8.39k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
8.21k (x0.77)
TOTAL
62.92k
53k (x0.84)
Multithread
i7-9750H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
124.63k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
158.62k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
69.79k (x2.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
7.53k (x0.8)
TOTAL
276.46k
360.57k (x1.3)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4