| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.5 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
4.31k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
17.51k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
10.53k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
23.57k (x1.81)
TOTAL
41.54k
55.92k (x1.35)

Multithread

i7-9750H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
24.18k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
117.98k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
70.96k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
8.08k (x0.68)
TOTAL
163.95k
221.19k (x1.35)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
20.37k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
22.52k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
10.18k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
21.49k (x2.01)
TOTAL
62.92k
74.56k (x1.18)

Multithread

i7-9750H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
144.01k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
191.86k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
84.53k (x3.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
6.5k (x0.69)
TOTAL
276.46k
426.9k (x1.54)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4