Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.5 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.5 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
427.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
16.66k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
26.01k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
9.31k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
9.15k (x0.85)
TOTAL
62.92k
61.12k (x0.97)
Multithread
i7-9750H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
144.48k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
192.46k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
83.17k (x3.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
7.51k (x0.8)
TOTAL
276.46k
427.61k (x1.55)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
12218 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4