Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 3700X gets 491.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.8 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 3700X gets 491.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.8 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
74.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
491.15k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
16.81k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
26.39k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
8.82k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
22.73k (x2.12)
TOTAL
62.92k
74.75k (x1.19)
Multithread
i7-9750H
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
170.29k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
213.21k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
96.03k (x3.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
11.62k (x1.24)
TOTAL
276.46k
491.15k (x1.78)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
3280 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
1477 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
179 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
7556 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
3821 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5998 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
2005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
16990 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4