| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.4 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
810f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
3.8k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
17.38k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
5.17k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
3.16k (x0.24)
TOTAL
41.54k
29.52k (x0.71)

Multithread

i7-9750H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
15.28k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
76.44k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
27.48k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
3.02k (x0.25)
TOTAL
163.95k
122.2k (x0.75)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
13.95k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
20.7k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
5.33k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
3.03k (x0.23)
TOTAL
59.03k
43.01k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-9750H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
58.56k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
92.95k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
28.55k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
2.98k (x0.25)
TOTAL
254.54k
183.04k (x0.72)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
13.04k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
22.35k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.37k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
3.4k (x0.26)
TOTAL
59.67k
44.15k (x0.74)

Multithread

i7-9750H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
56.49k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
100.74k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
28.21k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
3.04k (x0.26)
TOTAL
258.87k
188.49k (x0.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
14.2k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
23.23k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.35k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
5.18k (x0.48)
TOTAL
62.92k
47.96k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-9750H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
58.24k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
105.72k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
28.73k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
5.59k (x0.59)
TOTAL
276.46k
198.27k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4