Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
3.89k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
17.94k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
5.34k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
6.62k (x0.51)
TOTAL
41.54k
33.79k (x0.81)
Multithread
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
15.07k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
66.84k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
19.56k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
6.54k (x0.55)
TOTAL
163.95k
108.01k (x0.66)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
14.3k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
21.69k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
5.42k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
6.6k (x0.5)
TOTAL
59.03k
48k (x0.81)
Multithread
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
55.45k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
83.13k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
20.76k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
6.58k (x0.55)
TOTAL
254.54k
165.91k (x0.65)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
13.05k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
22.88k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.39k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
7.31k (x0.56)
TOTAL
59.67k
48.63k (x0.81)
Multithread
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
51.73k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
87.74k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
20.74k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
6.57k (x0.56)
TOTAL
258.87k
166.79k (x0.64)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
14.48k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
23.84k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.43k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
5.46k (x0.51)
TOTAL
62.92k
49.21k (x0.78)
Multithread
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
54.39k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
88.77k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
20.04k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
5.48k (x0.58)
TOTAL
276.46k
168.69k (x0.61)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4