Core i7-9750H vs FX 9590
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 258.9 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.9 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 258.9 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.9 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
600f20
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
45 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
11.51k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
9.57k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
4.19k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
7.14k (x0.55)
TOTAL
59.67k
32.41k (x0.54)
Multithread
i7-9750H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
55.13k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
51.69k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
27.02k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
3.81k (x0.32)
TOTAL
258.87k
137.65k (x0.53)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
1945 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2912 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
633 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
262 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
5753 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3624 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5439 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2894 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
13261 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4