| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs i5-11400


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.8 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0671
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
489.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
31.23k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
25.88k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
10.83k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
18.17k (x1.7)
TOTAL
62.92k
86.11k (x1.37)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
213.85k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
195.51k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
72.06k (x2.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
7.89k (x0.84)
TOTAL
276.46k
489.31k (x1.77)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
7528 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4