| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
406f1
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
237.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
12.16k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
11.82k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
3.02k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
2.4k (x0.21)
TOTAL
65.33k
29.39k (x0.45)

Multithread

i7-9750H

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
103.77k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
102.28k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
26.13k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
5.65k (x0.8)
TOTAL
286.43k
237.83k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4