| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.3 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2019
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
216.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
12.92k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
10.97k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
2.54k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
5.09k (x0.44)
TOTAL
65.33k
31.52k (x0.48)

Multithread

i7-9750H

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
103.33k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
87.67k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
20.1k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
4.91k (x0.69)
TOTAL
286.43k
216.02k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4