| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs i5-5200U


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 4.2 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306d4
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
2 /4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
68.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
13.58k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
12.14k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
3.18k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
2.92k (x0.25)
TOTAL
65.33k
31.81k (x0.49)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
28.89k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
28.74k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
7.31k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
3.74k (x0.53)
TOTAL
286.43k
68.69k (x0.24)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
4579 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4