Core i7-9750H vs i5-10400F
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
369.97k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
26.28k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
23.38k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
5.52k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
12.96k (x1.13)
TOTAL
65.33k
68.14k (x1.04)
Multithread
i7-9750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
163.67k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
159.74k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
39k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
7.56k (x1.07)
TOTAL
286.43k
369.97k (x1.29)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
5692 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4