| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs i3-7100


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 2.3 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
906e9
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
58.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
126.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
25.77k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
23.26k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
5.43k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
4.09k (x0.36)
TOTAL
65.33k
58.55k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
54.98k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
54.73k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
13.12k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
3.65k (x0.52)
TOTAL
286.43k
126.47k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
2480 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
6607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5964 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1393 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1049 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
15014 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4