| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs i3-6100


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 2.6 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
506e3
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
45 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
112.28k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
22.89k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
21.04k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
4.9k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
4.01k (x0.35)
TOTAL
65.33k
52.84k (x0.81)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
50.05k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
47.13k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
11.38k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
3.72k (x0.53)
TOTAL
286.43k
112.28k (x0.39)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
2202 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4