| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs i3-10105


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
253.93k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
28.9k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
25.85k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
5.88k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
8.29k (x0.72)
TOTAL
65.33k
68.92k (x1.05)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
111.69k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
110.23k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
28.45k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
3.56k (x0.5)
TOTAL
286.43k
253.93k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4