Core i7-9750H vs i3-10100T
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
227.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
24.31k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
22.15k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
5.14k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
8.46k (x0.74)
TOTAL
65.33k
60.06k (x0.92)
Multithread
i7-9750H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
101.48k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
98.04k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
24.28k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
3.86k (x0.55)
TOTAL
286.43k
227.67k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4