Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.9 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.9 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
a20f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
89.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
558.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
24.14k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
26.3k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
12.09k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
26.54k (x2.32)
TOTAL
65.33k
89.07k (x1.36)
Multithread
i7-9750H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
183.54k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
237.27k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
107.95k (x3.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
29.66k (x4.19)
TOTAL
286.43k
558.42k (x1.95)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
1028 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5596 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
2571 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
5646 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
18951 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4