Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.6 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.6 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
175.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
13.72k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
22.93k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
4.99k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
5.27k (x0.46)
TOTAL
65.33k
46.91k (x0.72)
Multithread
i7-9750H
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
50.54k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
93.33k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
25.25k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
6.07k (x0.86)
TOTAL
286.43k
175.18k (x0.61)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
5005 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4