| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
22.16k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
24.46k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
10.71k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
22.44k (x1.96)
TOTAL
65.33k
79.76k (x1.22)

Multithread

i7-9750H

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
112.5k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
153.92k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
67.75k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
11.47k (x1.62)
TOTAL
286.43k
345.64k (x1.21)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4