Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 5 2600
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
291.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
13.76k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
23.03k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
5.12k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
15.23k (x1.33)
TOTAL
65.33k
57.13k (x0.87)
Multithread
i7-9750H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
83.23k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
161.06k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
40.52k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
6.73k (x0.95)
TOTAL
286.43k
291.53k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
4485 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4