| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.4 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
198.27k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
14.2k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
23.23k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
5.35k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
5.18k (x0.45)
TOTAL
65.33k
47.96k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-9750H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
58.24k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
105.72k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
28.73k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
5.59k (x0.79)
TOTAL
286.43k
198.27k (x0.69)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4