Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
14.48k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
23.84k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
5.43k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
5.46k (x0.48)
TOTAL
65.33k
49.21k (x0.75)
Multithread
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
54.39k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
88.77k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
20.04k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
5.48k (x0.77)
TOTAL
286.43k
168.69k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4