Core i7-9750H vs i5-11300H
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
25.83k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
23.56k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
9.2k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
5.06k (x0.44)
TOTAL
65.33k
63.64k (x0.97)
Multithread
i7-9750H
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
116.87k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
121.08k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
41.8k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
6k (x0.85)
TOTAL
286.43k
285.75k (x1)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4