Core i7-9700K vs i7-10870H
Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 460 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-9700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 460 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-9700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/8
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
73.62k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
460.02k points
487.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.3k
30.38k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
27.95k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.86k
6.51k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.86k
14.37k (x1.12)
TOTAL
73.62k
79.2k (x1.08)
Multithread
i7-9700K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
217.77k
216.18k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
190.46k
210.82k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.48k
51.57k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
8.47k (x0.75)
TOTAL
460.02k
487.05k (x1.06)
Performance/W
i7-9700K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
2292 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2005 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
426 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
119 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
4842 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
5981 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5226 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1195 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
15025 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4