Core i7-9700K vs i5-10400T
Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 460 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 460 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
73.62k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
460.02k points
307.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.3k
22k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
19.98k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.86k
4.57k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.86k
11.31k (x0.88)
TOTAL
73.62k
57.85k (x0.79)
Multithread
i7-9700K
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
217.77k
136.69k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
190.46k
135.25k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.48k
32.76k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
2.48k (x0.22)
TOTAL
460.02k
307.18k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i7-9700K
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2292 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2005 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
426 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
119 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
4842 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5981 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5226 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1195 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
15025 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4