Core i7-9700K vs i5-10300H
Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 460 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 460 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
73.62k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
460.02k points
246.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.3k
27.14k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
24.75k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.86k
5.73k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.86k
11.84k (x0.92)
TOTAL
73.62k
69.47k (x0.94)
Multithread
i7-9700K
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
217.77k
105.77k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
190.46k
107.47k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.48k
24.82k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
8.02k (x0.71)
TOTAL
460.02k
246.07k (x0.53)
Performance/W
i7-9700K
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2292 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2005 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
426 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
119 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
4842 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5981 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5226 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1195 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15025 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4