| | | | | | |

Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 7 4800H


Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 460 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.1 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/8
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
73.62k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
460.02k points
436.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.3k
16.59k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
23.51k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.86k
9.38k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.86k
7.98k (x0.62)
TOTAL
73.62k
57.47k (x0.78)

Multithread

i7-9700K

4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
217.77k
152.43k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
190.46k
195.79k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.48k
83.2k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
5.38k (x0.48)
TOTAL
460.02k
436.8k (x0.95)

Performance/W
i7-9700K
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2292 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2005 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
426 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
119 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
4842 points/W
9707 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5981 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5226 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1195 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
15025 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4