Core i7-9700F vs i9-10900K
Description
The i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 269.9 k points while the i9-10900K gets 608.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.3 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 269.9 k points while the i9-10900K gets 608.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.3 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0655
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/8
10/20
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.93k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.85k points
685.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9700F
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.8k
19.5k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
24.08k
28.01k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
7.45k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.98k
15.82k (x1.13)
TOTAL
60.93k
70.79k (x1.16)
Multithread
i7-9700F
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
92.79k
194.49k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
135.13k
312.59k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.29k
89.14k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.64k
12.58k (x1.46)
TOTAL
269.85k
608.81k (x2.26)
Performance/W
i7-9700F
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1428 points/W
1556 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2079 points/W
2501 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
512 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
4152 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700F
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3575 points/GHz
3751 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5387 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1290 points/GHz
1433 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2975 points/GHz
3043 points/GHz
TOTAL
12964 points/GHz
13614 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4