Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 7 1800X
Description
The i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 164.3 k points while the 1800X gets 276 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.7 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 164.3 k points while the 1800X gets 276 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.7 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.93k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.85k points
410.47k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
4.14k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
17.16k
19.07k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.7k
5.77k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
18.28k (x1.27)
TOTAL
41.9k
47.26k (x1.13)
Multithread
i7-9700F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.31k
34.48k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
97.53k
169.65k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.53k
63.68k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
8.2k (x0.92)
TOTAL
164.31k
276.01k (x1.68)
Performance/W
i7-9700F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
405 points/W
363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1500 points/W
1786 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
485 points/W
670 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
138 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
2528 points/W
2905 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3652 points/GHz
4767 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1212 points/GHz
1442 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3057 points/GHz
4570 points/GHz
TOTAL
8915 points/GHz
11816 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4