Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 3550H
Description
The i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 164.3 k points while the 3550H gets 108.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1.5 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 164.3 k points while the 3550H gets 108.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1.5 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.93k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.85k points
178.26k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700F
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
3.63k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
17.16k
16.69k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.7k
4.92k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
5k (x0.35)
TOTAL
41.9k
30.24k (x0.72)
Multithread
i7-9700F
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.31k
13.62k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
97.53k
65.71k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.53k
23.7k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
5.64k (x0.63)
TOTAL
164.31k
108.67k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i7-9700F
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
405 points/W
389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1500 points/W
1877 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
485 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
138 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
2528 points/W
3105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700F
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3652 points/GHz
4512 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1212 points/GHz
1329 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3057 points/GHz
1352 points/GHz
TOTAL
8915 points/GHz
8174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4