| | | | | | |

Core i7-8750H vs i7-10870H


Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2.1 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
487.05k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-8750H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.01k
4.77k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
11.68k
19.81k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
6.29k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
14.03k (x2.49)
TOTAL
24.12k
44.9k (x1.86)

Multithread

i7-8750H

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
31.21k (x4.21)
Test#2 (FP)
29.99k
151.01k (x5.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.66k
50.13k (x5.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.12k
8.37k (x1.63)
TOTAL
52.18k
240.71k (x4.61)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-8750H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.14k
16.14k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
22.8k
24.74k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
5.98k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
12.7k (x1.16)
TOTAL
54.41k
59.55k (x1.09)

Multithread

i7-8750H

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
82.81k
117.03k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
118.58k
199.88k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.08k
50.64k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.86k
8.23k (x1.69)
TOTAL
231.34k
375.77k (x1.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8750H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.36k
30.38k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
27.95k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
6.51k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
14.37k (x1.96)
TOTAL
53.41k
79.2k (x1.48)

Multithread

i7-8750H

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.82k
216.18k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
100.47k
210.82k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
51.57k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
8.47k (x2.23)
TOTAL
231.9k
487.05k (x2.1)

Performance/W
i7-8750H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
2307 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2233 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
529 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
5153 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
5454 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1073 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1786 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
13027 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4