| | | | | | |

Core i7-8750H vs i5-10500T


Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
302.13k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-8750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.01k
3.87k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
11.68k
15.79k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.1k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
12.13k (x2.15)
TOTAL
24.12k
36.89k (x1.53)

Multithread

i7-8750H

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
22.17k (x2.99)
Test#2 (FP)
29.99k
101.79k (x3.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.66k
34.13k (x3.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.12k
3.74k (x0.73)
TOTAL
52.18k
161.83k (x3.1)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-8750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.14k
14.01k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
22.8k
21.17k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
5.21k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
11.42k (x1.04)
TOTAL
54.41k
51.82k (x0.95)

Multithread

i7-8750H

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
82.81k
82.38k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
118.58k
115.64k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.08k
32.22k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.86k
3.71k (x0.76)
TOTAL
231.34k
233.94k (x1.01)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.36k
25.16k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
22.28k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
5.18k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
11.97k (x1.64)
TOTAL
53.41k
64.6k (x1.21)

Multithread

i7-8750H

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
103.82k
144.86k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
100.47k
120.98k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
32.55k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
3.73k (x0.98)
TOTAL
231.9k
302.13k (x1.3)

Performance/W
i7-8750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2307 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2233 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
529 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
5153 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5454 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1073 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1786 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
13027 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4