| | | | | | |

Core i7-8750H vs i3-10100T


Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
227.67k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-8750H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.01k
4.32k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
11.68k
15.7k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.04k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
7.68k (x1.36)
TOTAL
24.12k
32.73k (x1.36)

Multithread

i7-8750H

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
16.59k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
29.99k
71.1k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.66k
23.26k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.12k
3.86k (x0.75)
TOTAL
52.18k
114.81k (x2.2)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-8750H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.14k
13.88k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
22.8k
20.94k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
5.18k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
8.2k (x0.75)
TOTAL
54.41k
48.19k (x0.89)

Multithread

i7-8750H

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
82.81k
54.88k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
118.58k
93.17k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.08k
23.34k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.86k
3.85k (x0.79)
TOTAL
231.34k
175.24k (x0.76)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8750H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.36k
24.31k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
22.15k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
5.14k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
8.46k (x1.16)
TOTAL
53.41k
60.06k (x1.12)

Multithread

i7-8750H

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
103.82k
101.48k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
100.47k
98.04k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
24.28k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
3.86k (x1.02)
TOTAL
231.9k
227.67k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i7-8750H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2307 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2233 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
529 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
5153 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5454 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1073 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1786 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
13027 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4